2000-VIL-587-CAL-DT

Equivalent Citation: [2001] 248 ITR 14, 166 CTR 485

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Date: 13.11.2000

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Vs

EL. PROPERTIES (P.) LTD.

BENCH

Judge(s)  : AJOY NATH RAY., RANJAN KUMAR MAZUMDAR 

JUDGMENT

This is an application for confirmation of rule. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal allowed in this case a deduction of Rs. 65,653, which was interest payable by the assessee in respect of unpaid municipal rates due to the Calcutta Municipal Corporation.

The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).

It is settled beyond dispute that interest on late payment of municipal rates is not in the nature of a payment of penalty, and is thus clearly deductible as general business expenses under section 37.

The requirement of section 43B that even for assessees following the mercantile system, payments by way of tax, duty, cess, etc., cannot be claimed as deductions unless actual payment has been made in the previous year, is also not applicable in this case, because the words of the section encompass the municipal rates, but not interest thereon.

There are binding authorities for this proposition, so far as we are concerned (see CIT v. Padmavati Raje Cotton Mills Ltd. [1999] 239 ITR 355 (Cal) and Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. CIT [1996] 218 ITR 450 (Cal)).

Confirmation of rule would thus be an empty exercise. Rule is thus discharged.

Parties and all others concerned to act on a signed copy of this order on the usual undertakings.

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.